=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= EDline Vol. 7, no. 53 (22 February 2002) Editorial mailing list (digest version) Published by the Electric Editors =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Contents: Q & A [2sl] Commas and quotes =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= ---[2]-- Q & A -------------------------------------------------- ** [2sl] Commas and quotes Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 From: John Morris, johnjeff@meadowdance.org We're working on an ESL piece for Spanish-language students (South American, I think). We're not doing the editing, but I've come across something that seems very foreign to me. The editors changed a passage to say that, when writing dialog, the comma at the end of a quoted phrase should be placed _after_ the final quotation mark. I have generally followed the rule that periods and commas always go inside the quote marks, so this is very strange. All the references (primarily for American English) that I have consulted agree with me. Can anyone tell me if this is different for other versions of English or for other languages? ---------------------- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 From: David Ibbetson, isserlis@rogers.com In British English a stop at the end of a quote at the end goes outside the closing quote unless it (the stop) is part of the Dialogue. US rules are different. I gather that there is some doubt about question marks and screamers (?!) ---------------------- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 From: Michael Lewis, mlewis@brandle.com.au John Morris wrote: > Can anyone tell me if this is different for other versions of > English or for other languages? It certainly is. British (and Australian, and I think Canadian) practice is to punctuate "according to sense". See what I've just done: the phrase inside the scare quotes, and the quote marks themselves, are _part_ of the sentence, so the period goes after the lot. But here comes another passage in quotes. "I want to go home." Here, the quotation _includes_ the entire sentence -- the sentence is part of the quotation, so the period goes inside the quotes. British practice follows the same principles with parentheses as with quotes. ---------------------- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 From: Eddie Kent, edlineek@aol.com Michael Lewis writes: > It certainly is. British (and Australian, and I think Canadian) > practice is to punctuate "according to sense". This is good in theory, but in practice it often happens that the punctuation goes inside the quotes. The reason given is that otherwise there would be an obvious gap between letter and comma. I have given up fighting on this one. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= END OF EDline 7.53 Admin page: < http://www.electriceditors.net/edline/admin.htm > ** The views expressed in this mailing list are strictly those of the individual contributors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the moderators or of the Electric Editors. ** Articles (c) 2001, 2002, by individual contributors Design (c) 1996--2002 Iain Brown Compilation (c) 2002, Iain Brown / The Electric Editors =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=