=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= EDline Vol. 7, no. 56 (22 February 2002) Editorial mailing list (digest version) Published by the Electric Editors =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Contents: Q & A [2so] Go / went / became extinct? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= ---[2]-- Q & A -------------------------------------------------- ** [2so] Go / went / became extinct? Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 From: Peter Best, pbest@idl.net.au Watching an elaborately produced TV prog last night. The narrator used the expression "went extinct" in referring to the extinction of a species. How does the Edline community feel re this usage? ---------------------- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 From: Jane Lyle, jlyle@indiana.edu Speaking only for U.S. English, I don't have a problem with it. It is in common use among our paleontology authors. A Web search yields hits on "went extinct" from a number of paleontology and science museums in the U.S. and Canada, as well as from numerous universities, National Geographic, PBS, the BBC, and the Monash Science Centre at Monash University. ---------------------- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 From: Judy Stein, jstein@panix.com > the expression "went extinct" Wouldn't be acceptable in anything but informal writing. "Become" is the appropriate verb. I think you might say "came back from near-extinction," though. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= END OF EDline 7.56 Admin page: < http://www.electriceditors.net/edline/admin.htm > ** The views expressed in this mailing list are strictly those of the individual contributors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the moderators or of the Electric Editors. ** Articles (c) 2001, 2002, by individual contributors Design (c) 1996--2002 Iain Brown Compilation (c) 2002, Iain Brown / The Electric Editors =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=