=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  EDline Vol. 8, no. 44   (24 April 2003)

  Editorial mailing list (digest version)
  Published by the Electric Editors
  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  Contents:

         FYI
  [3hq]  Tertiary education editors: questionnaire

  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


---[3]-- FYI ----------------------------------------------------

         Date: Wed, 16 April 2003
         From: Rosemary Noble, rin@deakin.edu.au

My colleague, Vern Field and I are preparing a paper to present
at the Australian National Editors Conference to be held in
Brisbane in July 2003. Our topic is 'The role of the editor in
tertiary institutions' and we hope to not only develop a case
study about editing at our own institution, Deakin University,
but also to compare the editorial practices of other
institutions, especially those with large external student
cohorts.

We have prepared a questionnaire to gather this information and
would love to hear from you if you have experience in this type
of workplace and are willing to complete and return the
questionnaire to us over the next couple of weeks. Please reply
off list to me at 

  < rin@deakin.edu.au >

and I will forward the questionnaire.

Rosemary Noble
Faculty Planning Coordinator
Learning Services
Deakin University, Melbourne Campus


  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  END OF EDline 8.44

  Admin page: < http://www.electriceditors.net/edline/admin.htm >

  ** The views expressed in this mailing list are strictly those
  of the individual contributors, and do not necessarily reflect
  the views of the moderators or of the Electric Editors. **

  Articles (c) 2002--2003, by individual contributors
  Design (c) 1996--2003 Iain Brown
  Compilation (c) 2003 Iain Brown / The Electric Editors
  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=